Valentine’s Day 2014 brought the exciting news that the long-missing footage of Act II from a 1959 BBC broadcast of the Royal Ballet production of The Sleeping Beauty has been rediscovered in the BBC Archive Centre and will be shown as part of a series of four ballet-themed programs to be aired on the network beginning in March. But discovered by whom? As always, I am somewhat confused by the differences in usage between over there and over here. According to the account in the Telegraph: “The black and white film was placed in the BBC archives but, for reasons unknown, Act II was lost and two copies of Act I were wrongly filed instead …. Last year, BBC researchers spent months scouring the archive and found a surviving copy of Act II.” Or, alternatively, as described in the Guardian: “It took a few months of searching before Act II was found in the BBC archives at Perivale. ‘One of the archive researchers there had a bit of a hunch. It was a magical moment for us when we finally saw it.'” I presume “researcher” or “archive researcher” is the equivalent of what we might call a research archivist, reference archivist, or public service archivist.
In other dispatches from the confusion front, New Yorker dance critic, Joan Acocella, subtitles her piece in this week’s issue: “An archivist explores ballet’s obsessions.” The archivist in question? Pacific Northwest Ballet’s Doug Fullington (whose official company title is “Education Programs Manager and Assistant to the Artistic Director”), who will be in New York to present “Petipa Exotique” the latest installment in the Guggenheim’s Works & Process series, which will include a selection of excerpts from the choreographer’s work reconstructed by Fullington from Stepanov notation. To paraphrase another dead person, “I know archivists, and Doug Fullington is no archivist.